Industry Zone
Rules, Regulations, Requirements


Directives

Printer Friendly Version

Directive 056: Frequently Asked Questions-Pipelines Technical 

SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS
Question: With regard to Surface Development, please clarify "place of business", "distance to the nearest surface development", and what to capture as the nearest surface development in a remote area.
PIPELINE REPLACEMENTS
Question: When replacing a section of pipeline that is less than 100m in length, can the replacement portion be of a higher grade then originally licensed for and no application is required?
PIPELINE INSTALLATIONS
Question: I am submitting an application to construct a compressor station but am not sure whether to apply for a Pipeline Installation under schedule 3 or a facility application under schedule 2. Can you provide clarification?
PIPELINE CROSSING AGREEMENTS
Question: Can a pipeline application be submitted if crossing consents from third parties such as Telus, AENV, etc. have not been obtained?
CONSERVATION AND RECLAMATION NOTIFICATION
Question: The October 1, 2003 edition of Guide 56 (now Directive 056) no longer asks whether the Conservation and Reclamation inspector has been notified for class II pipelines. Does this mean that notification to AENV is no longer required?
Question: We are preparing an application for a Class I pipeline in the White Area, and advertising is required for AENV Conservation and Reclamation (C&R) approval. Can the pipeline application be submitted to the EUB prior to the AENV Notice Expiry Date?
PREPARATORY WORK
Question: If a company has obtained landowner approval, all applicable agreements are in place, the right-of-way is surveyed, and an EUB pipeline licence application is underway but not yet approved, can that company commence work such as string, bend, and weld pipe, prior to receiving the EUB approval provided it does not create any ground disturbance?
CONVERSION TO SOUR SERVICE
Question: Please clarify what the technical requirements and procedures are for conversion to "sour service".
SURFACE PIPELINES
Question: What information is a company expected to submit to the EUB when making an application for a temporary or a permanent surface pipeline?
Question: If the permanent surface pipeline is associated with a thermal in situ oil sands operation, what nonroutine documentation would be required?
Question: Do I require a Directive 056 pipeline licence if I am planning to construct surface pipelines associated with an approved in situ oil sands scheme contained within the area of a single blocked MSL issued by SRD?
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING
Question Do I need to fill in the distance to the nearest residence for Category B pipelines? if so, how is that managed when the line is remote?
Question :How do I represent the maximum calculated EPZ when I am applying to add a number of different segments onto a single licence?
Question :When completing Schedule 3, do I indicate the number of surface developments within the EPZ for the entire pipeline licence or only for the portion of the licence that I am adding lines to?
Question :How should I answer the new questions on distance to residences and EPZ issues when I am applying for a licence amendment to indicate that the line is not constructed?
Directive 071: Emergency Preparedness and Response Requirements for the Petroleum Industry (April 2008)
Question: What EPZ should I record on my Directive 056 application schedule?
Question: How does the April 2008 edition of Directive 071 affect my Directive 056 participant involvement program for applications submitted after April 8, 2008?
PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS
Question: Directive 056 now includes a requirement to submit right-of-way plans for pipeline applications. When are they required, and at what scale should they be submitted?
CO2 PIPELINES
Question: I am planning to construct a new pipeline in order to transport carbon dioxide (CO2). How should the application be submitted to the ERCB for approval?
INCOMPATIBLE SUBSTANCES
Question: We are planning to build a sour gas pipeline that we want to tie into an existing oil effluent pipeline. How do I submit an application for a Category C or D natural gas pipeline that would tie into an existing oil effluent pipeline?
FREE-STANDING LINER SPECIFICATIONS
Question: I am submitting an application to install a free-standing liner in an existing pipeline. When completing Schedule 3.1, how do I show the pipe specifications to indicate that a free-standing liner is being installed?
PIPELINE LINE SPLITS
Question:I am planning to discontinue or abandon a portion of an existing pipeline that is currently licensed as operating with the ERCB. How do I submit a Licence Amendment Application to be in compliance with Directive 056?

SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS
Question: With regard to Surface Development, please clarify "place of business", "distance to the nearest surface development", and what to capture as the nearest surface development in a remote area.
Answer: The following information will provide some background and clarification:

Surface Development Clarification
The distance required to the nearest "surface development" provides the EUB with an indication as to whether a site specific ERP is required. Please note that the distance has no bearing on the Directive 056 participant involvement requirements.

Surface Development Definition
The following definition replaces the previous "distance to nearest occupied dwelling" in Schedule 4, Step 10 of the Guide 56 (October 2000) (now Directive 056). The change in text was required to coincide with the new "surface development" definition set out in Guide 71: Emergency Response Planning (now Directive 071). The definition in Appendix 3 of Directive 056 (October 2003) quotes Directive 071, stating that a surface development is:

An occupied permanent or part-time dwelling, a publicly used facility, including a campground, a place of business, and any other surface development where the public may gather.

Place of Business
A "place of business" with respect to oil and gas developments will include the nearest off-lease building that is manned by staff or where people may work or gather on a regular basis. An example of a nearest off-lease place of business would be a field office located at a compressor station in the adjacent section where people may gather on a regular basis. A compressor, pipeline, or wellhead without a manned building would not be considered a place of business.

Please do not record the distance to the nearest well, facility, or pipeline as the distance to the nearest "surface development" unless there is a building on the lease or right-of-way where people may gather on a regular basis.

Distance to Nearest Surface Development
In order to answer the question "Distance to nearest surface development" on Schedule 2, 3 (pipeline installations only), or 4 the applicant must locate the distance to the nearest surface development from either:

  • the well centre
  • edge of pipeline right-of-way, or
  • the edge of the facility lease

Survey Plan or Plot Plan
The survey plan or plot plan must meet all Directive 056 requirements and should reflect the distance to the nearest:

  • dwelling whether occupied part time or fulltime (e.g.; house, seasonal cottage, trapper's cabin),
  • publicly used facility (e.g.; church, community centre, campground, curling rink),
  • place of business (as described above), or
  • other surface development where the public may gather

Remote or Undeveloped Areas
The distance to the nearest surface development is used to determine if a site specific ERP is required. In remote or undeveloped areas, the applicant must initially search to the distance of the emergency awareness zone  (EAZ) (two times the  size of the emergency planning zone  EPZ ) for any surface developments. If there is no surface development within the EAZ, the applicant may record a distance to the nearest town, village, or urban centre. Where there is no EPZ the search should encompass at least 1.5 km. The applicant may then choose to use 1.5 km as the distance to the nearest surface development. This process is to be used only in remote or undeveloped areas for the purpose of a Directive 056 licence application.

Surface Development and Surface Improvement
The term "surface development" should not be confused with the definition for "surface improvement". Please refer to Directive 056, Appendix 3 for a definition of "surface improvement".

TOP

PIPELINE REPLACEMENTS
Question: When replacing a section of pipeline that is less than 100m in length, can the replacement portion be of a higher grade then originally licensed for and no application is required?
Answer: Any replacement (regardless of category) less than 100 meters that meets the criteria discussed in Sections 6.5.2 and 6.9.9 of Directive 056 does not require an application. Replacements using a higher pipe grade are acceptable and no application is required.
PIPELINE INSTALLATIONS
Question: I am submitting an application to construct a compressor station but am not sure whether to apply for a Pipeline Installation under schedule 3 or a facility application under schedule 2. Can you provide clarification?
Answer: As discussed in Sections 6.1 and 6.9.22 of Directive 056, a Pipeline Installation would be a compressor station, pump station, tank farm, or pipeline loading/unloading facility associated with pipelines carrying processed sales product. These installations would be located downstream of a gas processing facility or battery. Category C and D line heaters are also considered pipeline installations. Upstream facilities would be licensed under Schedule 2.

TOP

PIPELINE CROSSING AGREEMENTS
Question: Can a pipeline application be submitted if crossing consents from third parties such as Telus, AENV, etc. have not been obtained?
Answer: An application can be submitted prior to obtaining crossing consents. They must be in place prior to construction.
CONSERVATION AND RECLAMATION NOTIFICATION
Question: The October 1, 2003 edition of Guide 56 (now Directive 056) no longer asks whether the Conservation and Reclamation inspector has been notified for class II pipelines. Does this mean that notification to AENV is no longer required?
Answer: Directive 056 no longer requires operators to notify AENV when they propose to locate an oil and gas facility (including a wellsite, battery, pipeline) and access road on private land in environmentally sensitive areas, however, AENV conservation and reclamation requirements under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA) must be met.

For AENV guidance when siting an upstream oil and gas site on private land, please refer to R&R/03-2 "Siting an Upstream Oil and Gas Site in an Environmentally Sensitive Area on Private Land", can be viewed at AENV website located at: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/5940.pdf

Question: We are preparing an application for a Class I pipeline in the White Area, and advertising is required for AENV Conservation and Reclamation (C&R) approval. Can the pipeline application be submitted to the EUB prior to the AENV Notice Expiry Date?
Answer: Before you may submit a routine pipeline application, the 30-day AENV notification period must have expired. The EUB will not approve a pipeline licence if the AENV notification period has not expired. Routine pipeline applications filed prior to this expiry date will be closed. Nonroutine applications for which concerns or objections remain unresolved may be submitted as nonroutine before the 30-day expiry. The EUB encourages proponents to consider joint notice of the application as defined in the Pipeline Act and Regulation and the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA).

TOP

PREPARATORY WORK
Question: If a company has obtained landowner approval, all applicable agreements are in place, the right-of-way is surveyed, and an EUB pipeline licence application is underway but not yet approved, can that company commence work such as string, bend, and weld pipe, prior to receiving the EUB approval provided it does not create any ground disturbance?
Answer: Part 4, Section 6(1) of the Pipeline Act states that:

No person shall construct a pipeline or any part of a pipeline or undertake any operations preparatory or incidental to the construction of a pipeline unless the person is the holder of a licence or unless the person is acting pursuant to a direction of the Board under section 33 authorizing the person to do so

Section 6 (1) prohibits any preparatory or incidental operations, on private or public lands, prior to receiving a pipeline licence from the EUB. However, Section 6(2) of the Pipeline Act allows for access to the lands, prior to issuance of a licence, to make surveys and for negotiation purposes. Therefore, a company may not do any preparatory work prior to receiving pipeline licence approval from the EUB. The exception to this would be by direction of the Board under section 33 of the Pipeline Act and to conduct surveying of the pipeline right-of-way for the purpose of a pipeline licence application.

CONVERSION TO SOUR SERVICE
Question: Please clarify what the technical requirements and procedures are for conversion to "sour service".
Answer: The EUB's document EUB Reference Tool for Sour Service Conversion of Existing Carbon Steel Pipelines provides a standardized approach for the preparation, review, and approval of technical requirements for sour service conversion of existing carbon steel pipelines. The process outlined in this document must also be followed for the resumption of abandoned pipelines in a sour service environment and change of substance from sour service to sour gas.

The EUB Reference Tool for Sour Service Conversion of Existing Carbon Steel Pipelines document compiles the current CSA sour service requirements in a comprehensive manner and highlights certain requirements already contained in Directive 056: Energy Development Applications and Schedules. The document is located on the EUB website at http://www.ercb.ca

TOP

SURFACE PIPELINES
Question: What information is a company expected to submit to the EUB when making an application for a temporary or a permanent surface pipeline?
Answer: Category B, C, and D surface pipelines that are in continuous use for less than 21 days for "well testing purposes" do not require a Directive 056 pipeline licence application. Category B, C, and D surface pipelines that are in use for less than 21 days for "purposes other than well testing" require a Directive 056 pipeline application. All surface pipelines in continuous use for more than 21 consecutive days require a Directive 056 pipeline licence application.

When an application to the EUB for a Category C or D surface pipeline is required, the applicant must include documentation to support the design, safety, and need for the pipeline, as described below. Be sure to refer to Directive 056 and the current Directive 056 Errata, Section 6.9.10: Surface Pipelines and Step 7: Technical Considerations for all details.

Design Considerations
Design requirements for surface pipelines are described in Section 21 of the Pipeline Regulation, which states:

21    (1) A licensee of an existing pipeline, well or facility who intends to install a surface pipeline for temporary service shall do so in accordance with the requirements set out in this section and in Directive 56.

(2) A licensee shall install

(a) a form of pressure-relieving device if any possibility of a pressure increase above the allowable maximum operating pressure exists due to a rise in ambient air temperature or solar heating,
(b) a system to allow for adequate expansion or contraction due to temperature change,
(c) temperature monitoring equipment if the pipeline material has temperature limitations,
(d) suitable restraints to adequately control lateral or vertical movement, and
(e) any other safety or operational systems the Board considers appropriate.


(3) A licensee shall bury the pipeline at all road and trail crossings and shall install pipeline warning signs at the point of pipeline entry and exit of each crossing.

(4) A licensee shall take additional precautions, including adding extra pipeline warning signs or providing other warnings to indicate the presence of a surface line, when

(a) equipment may be working in the vicinity of the pipeline,
(b) off road vehicular traffic may endanger the pipeline, or
(c) any conditions may obscure or endanger the pipeline.

In addition to the above, the applicant must provide

  • a detailed explanation of the pipeline design that includes consideration of the downstream pipeline effects and compatibility with connecting pipelines, and
  • information on the corrosion control, monitoring program, and mitigation measures for the proposed surface pipeline, which includes assessing any impacts that adding and later removing the flow will have on the flow regimen of the connecting pipelines.

Safety Considerations
The applicant is required to provide a description of the measures that will be taken to protect the pipeline from third-party damage.

Need
The applicant is required to provide a discussion regarding the need for the surface pipeline, whether permanent or temporary.

Please keep in mind that the EUB's Operations Group, Pipeline Section, will review the application and supporting documentation; therefore, the applicant should allow for review time when making a surface pipeline application.

Question: If the permanent surface pipeline is associated with a thermal in situ oil sands operation, what nonroutine documentation would be required?
Answer: The change in the definition of sour service in CSA Z662-07 has resulted in applications for oil effluent surface pipelines that have a partial pressure greater than 0.30 kPa but less than or equal to 70.0 kPa to be filed nonroutine according to Directive 056 requirements. Prior to this change, these pipelines were applied for as Category B and filed as routine; now they must be applied for as Category C and filed as nonroutine. If the proposed pipeline meets all the criteria below, submission of the nonroutine documentation as outlined on page 6-46 of Directive 056 is not required.

Criteria
1. The proposed pipeline is a permanent surface pipeline.
2. The proposed pipeline is part of a thermal in situ operation (for example, SAGD or cyclic steam injection) for the purpose of crude bitumen production in a designated oil sands area.
3. The proposed pipeline is steel.
4. The proposed pipeline will be licensed as oil effluent.
5. The H2S partial pressure is greater than 0.30 kPa but less than or equal to 70.0 kPa.

Process
If all of the statements above can be answered YES, submit this information in writing in place of the nonroutine documentation outlined on page 6-46 of Directive 056. The application must still be filed as nonroutine.

If any of these statements can be answered NO and the pipeline is Category C or D, submit the support documentation outlined on page 6-46 of Directive 056. These applications will continue to be reviewed by the ERCB’s Operations Group, Pipeline Section.

Note: Please be sure to indicate on Schedule 3.1 that these are surface pipelines by entering the code “SC” (surface crossing) in the ENVIR column.
Question: Do I require a Directive 056 pipeline licence if I am planning to construct surface pipelines associated with an approved in situ oil sands scheme contained within the area of a single blocked MSL issued by SRD?
Answer:The ERCB has fielded numerous queries regarding whether or not Directive 056 licences are required for in situ oil sands surface pipelines if the subject pipelines extend beyond the lease boundary of a well pad, facility, or central processing plant but are wholly contained within a single blocked MSL area.

It appears that a blocked MSL area boundary may be misinterpreted as a single surface lease boundary. Consequently, any surface pipelines wholly contained within a blocked MSL that connect a well pad to a central processing plant might be erroneously considered exempt, as set out in Directive 056, Section 6.5.2.

The ERCB would like to clarify that the facility surface lease boundary described in both Directive 056, Section 6.5.2, and the Pipeline Regulation, Part 1, Section 3(3b), is not the same as the area boundary defining a blocked MSL issued by SRD. Rather, a facility surface lease boundary is specific to the lease boundary of each well pad, facility, or central processing plant.

In situ oil sands surface pipelines wholly contained within the boundary of a well pad, facility, or central processing plant and also located within a blocked MSL would not require a Directive 056 licence.

In situ oil sands surface pipelines that extend beyond the well pad, facility, or central processing plant lease boundary but are still within the blocked MSL area boundary require a Directive 056 pipeline application to be submitted and approved prior to construction. In such instances, the participant involvement requirements conducted under Directive 023: Guidelines Respecting an Application for a Commercial Crude Bitumen Recovery and Upgrading Project would satisfy the participant involvement requirements for the Directive 056 application.

Applicants are strongly encouraged to review existing in situ oil sands surface pipelines to ensure that they meet current Directive 056 licensing requirements. Any applicants that identify existing in situ oil sands surface pipelines that require licensing must submit to the Facilities Applications Audit Section a complete self-disclosure application, as set out in Process Clarification for Licensing Pipeline Amendments, Scenario 3.

Companies are reminded that licences for surface pipelines associated with oil sands mine approvals are not issued under Directive 056 unless the pipelines cross a public road or watercourse.

  

TOP

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING
Question:Do I need to fill in the distance to the nearest residence for Category B pipelines? If so, how is that managed when the line is remote?
Answer:The distance to the nearest residence is a required element for new construction for all pipeline categories and types. For remote pipelines, if there are no residences within the EPZ or 1.5 km, whichever is greater, the distance to the nearest urban centre from any portion of pipeline being licensed can be used as an alternative. For licence amendments, leave this section blank.
Question:How do I represent the maximum calculated EPZ when I am applying to add a number of different segments onto a single licence?
Answer:The maximum calculated EPZ should represent the largest EPZ of any portion of pipeline included in the application. If there are numerous diverse line segments included in an application, the largest EPZ of any of those segments should be indicated on Schedule 3. This question applies to new construction and to licence amendments for pipelines with an EPZ. If there is no EPZ associated with any of the segments, enter 0.
Question:When completing Schedule 3, do I indicate the number of surface developments within the EPZ for the entire pipeline licence or only for the portion of the licence that I am adding lines to?
Answer:The number of surface developments in the EPZ should represent the surface developments in the EPZ for all line segments being applied for. This question applies to new construction and to licence amendments for pipelines with an EPZ. If there is no EPZ associated with any of the segments, enter 0.
Question:How should I answer the new questions of distance to residences and EPZ issues when I am applying for a licence amendment to indicate that the line is not constructed?
Answer:Applications for removal, abandonment/partial removal, or not constructed pipelines should represent the EPZ and number of surface developments in the EPZ as 0 regardless of the category/type of the pipeline when it was initially licensed. The distance to nearest residence section should be left blank.

TOP

Directive 071: Emergency Preparedness and Response Requirements for the Petroleum Industry (April 2008)
Question: What EPZ should I record on my Directive 056 application schedule?
Answer:For category C, D, and E applications submitted after April 8, 2008, you are required to record the EPZ determined by the April 2008 edition of Directive 071 unless the proposed project is exempt for reasons set out in Attachment A, Section 2 of Bulletin 2008-15

If exempt, you are required to record the EPZ determined by the 2005 edition of Directive 071 and to attach a description of the Directive 071 exemption that is applicable to your application.
Question: How does the April 2008 edition of Directive 071 affect my Directive 056 participant involvement program for applications submitted after April 8, 2008?
Answer:Section 2.2.2 of Directive 056 requires applicants to include in their project-specific information package the participants’ location relative to the EPZ. In the case of category C, D, and E wells, applicants are also required to personally consult with and obtain confirmation of nonobjection from residents within the EPZ (Table 7.1 of Directive 056 ).

If exempt
for reasons set out in Attachment A, Section 2 of Bulletin 2008-15 , there should be no impact to your Directive 056 participant involvement program.

If not exempt:
  • and the Directive 056 participant involvement program was not completed prior to April 8, 2008, you are required to ensure that the new EPZ based on the requirements of the April 2008 edition of Directive 071 has been reflected in the project-specific information package and that the radius of personal consultation and confirmation of nonobjection for category C, D, and E wells is based on the new EPZ prior to submitting a Directive 056 application; or
     
  • if the Directive 056 participant involvement program was completed prior to April 8, 2008, based on EPZ calculations from the 2005 edition of Directive 071 , you will be required to renotify residents in accordance with Table 3 of the 2008 edition of Directive 071 prior to the submission of your Directive 056 application. This means that if the EPZ increased, notification of residents within the expanded portion of the EPZ is required, or if the EPZ is smaller, notification of residents who are no longer in the EPZ is required. Enforcement action will not be applied to applications processed during the Directive 071 (April 2008) transition period, April 8 to July 2, 2008, for noncompliance issues related to Directive 056 EPZ requirements

For applications currently before the Board in a hearing process, the decision to require the applicant to recalculate the EPZ using ERCBH2S and rewrite its plan in accordance with the requirements in the April 2008 edition of Directive 071 will be at the discretion of the Board and considered on a case-by-case basis.

TOP

PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS
Question: Directive 056 now includes a requirement to submit right-of-way plans for pipeline applications. When are they required, and at what scale should they be submitted?
Answer:With the June 2008 release of Directive 056, the ERCB added a requirement to submit paper copies of pipeline right-of-way plans along with base maps for pipeline applications. These comments are included here in order to assist industry in understanding when it is required to submit these diagrams.

The right-of-way plan is required as a supplement to the ERCB base map requirements only for pipeline applications that involve new construction or an amendment to change or correct the pipeline route/right-of-way. The right-of-way plan contains significantly more detail than the ERCB base map and is important for ERCB processors to evaluate the application.

These plans can be represented as either individual ownership plats (IOPs) or as a plan of the entire route. For lengthy pipeline routes, a series of pages is preferred to a single small-scale map that shows the entire route. Use of a scale smaller than 1:25 000 might not adequately represent topographic or water course crossing details in certain circumstances.
CO2 PIPELINES
Question: I am planning to construct a new pipeline in order to transport carbon dioxide (CO2). How should the application be submitted to the ERCB for approval?

TOP

Answer:CO2 has some unique properties that need specific design considerations. While most of these design parameters could be found in CSA Z662-07, they are scattered in various clauses and could easily be missed by designers. Some design considerations are not included in Z662-07; therefore the application has to be technically reviewed to ensure that the design is based on sound engineering practice.

The ERCB needs to review all pipelines being licensed, whether new or an amendment to an existing line, to transport CO2 (under either Miscellaneous Gas or Miscellaneous Liquids) prior to approval. The applicant must file its application as nonroutine by selecting NO in Schedule 3: Step 7, question 3, regarding meeting current CSA standards.

Technical documentation in support of the nonroutine application should include, at a minimum, the following information:
• specific operating pressure ranges and pressure drops to avoid unnecessary phase change,
• corrosion mitigation and monitoring issues due to water content and other impurities,
• specific material consideration to minimize risk of fracture propagation,
• ERP, EPZ, and dispersion modelling considerations, and
• safety precautions during pipeline operation and repair.

Questions regarding additional technical documentation requirements can be directed to Shu Lee (ERCB Pipeline Operations Group) at 403-297-3367.
 
INCOMPATIBLE SUBSTANCES
Question: We are planning to build a sour gas pipeline that we want to tie into an existing oil effluent pipeline. How do I submit an application for a Category C or D natural gas pipeline that would tie into an existing oil effluent pipeline?
Answer:The ERCB cannot approve an application for a Category C or D gas pipeline that would tie into an existing Category B or C oil effluent pipeline. Refer to the Pipeline Act, Part 4, Section 17, which provides details on the transmission of unauthorized substances.

Prior to submitting an application for a new or existing Category C or D gas pipeline that would tie into an existing oil effluent pipeline, the applicant must first receive approval to amend the substance of the downstream oil effluent pipeline to match the substance of the proposed Category C or D gas pipeline. Directive 056 Section 6.9.17 (47) lists the technical items to consider when changing the substance of the oil effluent pipeline.

Pages 6-50 and 6-51 of Directive 056 set out the additional technical documentation required in support of any applicable nonroutine substance change application if the category of the existing oil effluent pipeline would change either from Category B to C or D or from Category C to D. In addition, Directive 056, Table 6.2 outlines the applicable participant involvement requirements that must be met prior to filing the substance change amendment if the category of the oil effluent pipeline is proposed to change to a Category D gas pipeline.
 
FREE-STANDING LINER SPECIFICATIONS
Question: I am submitting an application to install a free-standing liner in an existing pipeline. When completing Schedule 3.1, how do I show the pipe specifications to indicate that a free-standing liner is being installed?
Answer:In Schedule 3.1, Step 1: Pipeline Specification/Substance,
  • enter the outside diameter, wall thickness, material (MAT.), type, grade, and joints of the existing pipe,
  • enter the maximum operating pressure (MOP) of the proposed liner,
  • do not fill in the stress level (i.e., should be left blank), and
  • enter an ‘L’ in the internal protection (IP) box to indicate that a free-standing liner is being installed.

TOP

PIPELINE LINE SPLITS
Question: I am planning to discontinue or abandon a portion of an existing pipeline that is currently licensed as operating with the ERCB. How do I submit a Licence Amendment Application to be in compliance with Directive 056?
Answer:If an applicant intends to discontinue or abandon a portion of an existing pipeline, it must first submit a Directive 056 licence amendment application to split the subject pipeline. Table 6.2 and Section 6.9.13 in Directive 056 clearly state that applicants must receive ERCB approval prior to physically splitting the line in the field.

Once the line split amendment has been approved, the applicant can proceed with the required work to physically split the line in the field and then discontinue or abandon the applicable pipeline segment. In accordance with Alberta Pipeline Regulations, applicants must then file another licence amendment application within 90 days of completing the discontinuation or abandonment operation advising the ERCB of the status change.

If all fieldwork (including both the line split and discontinuation or abandonment work) is completed prior to receiving the line split approval, applicants must submit a line split and status amendment application to the Facilities Applications Audit Group as a self-disclosure to the Facilities Applications Audit group, in accordance with Scenario 3 of the Process Clarification for Licensing Pipeline Amendment protocol.

 

TOP

Page Last Updated: June 10, 2009